CVE Feed

    Dashboard / CVE

    5.9
    Medium

    CVE-2021-23841

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    The OpenSSL public API function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() attempts to create a unique hash value based on the issuer and serial number data contained within an X509 certificate. However it fails to correctly handle any errors that may occur while parsing the issuer field (which might occur if the issuer field is maliciously constructed). This may subsequently result in a NULL pointer deref and a crash leading to a potential denial of service attack. The function X509_issuer_and_serial_hash() is never directly called by OpenSSL itself so applications are only vulnerable if they use this function directly and they use it on certificates that may have been obtained from untrusted sources. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x).

    Published: 16 Feb 2021
    7.5
    High

    CVE-2021-23840

    Last Modified: 16 Apr 2026

    Calls to EVP_CipherUpdate, EVP_EncryptUpdate and EVP_DecryptUpdate may overflow the output length argument in some cases where the input length is close to the maximum permissable length for an integer on the platform. In such cases the return value from the function call will be 1 (indicating success), but the output length value will be negative. This could cause applications to behave incorrectly or crash. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1i and below are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1j. OpenSSL versions 1.0.2x and below are affected by this issue. However OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1j (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2x).

    Published: 16 Feb 2021
    5.6
    Medium

    CVE-2021-20066

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    JSDom improperly allows the loading of local resources, which allows for local files to be manipulated by a malicious web page when script execution is enabled.

    Published: 16 Feb 2021
    3.7
    Low

    CVE-2021-23839

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    OpenSSL 1.0.2 supports SSLv2. If a client attempts to negotiate SSLv2 with a server that is configured to support both SSLv2 and more recent SSL and TLS versions then a check is made for a version rollback attack when unpadding an RSA signature. Clients that support SSL or TLS versions greater than SSLv2 are supposed to use a special form of padding. A server that supports greater than SSLv2 is supposed to reject connection attempts from a client where this special form of padding is present, because this indicates that a version rollback has occurred (i.e. both client and server support greater than SSLv2, and yet this is the version that is being requested). The implementation of this padding check inverted the logic so that the connection attempt is accepted if the padding is present, and rejected if it is absent. This means that such as server will accept a connection if a version rollback attack has occurred. Further the server will erroneously reject a connection if a normal SSLv2 connection attempt is made. Only OpenSSL 1.0.2 servers from version 1.0.2s to 1.0.2x are affected by this issue. In order to be vulnerable a 1.0.2 server must: 1) have configured SSLv2 support at compile time (this is off by default), 2) have configured SSLv2 support at runtime (this is off by default), 3) have configured SSLv2 ciphersuites (these are not in the default ciphersuite list) OpenSSL 1.1.1 does not have SSLv2 support and therefore is not vulnerable to this issue. The underlying error is in the implementation of the RSA_padding_check_SSLv23() function. This also affects the RSA_SSLV23_PADDING padding mode used by various other functions. Although 1.1.1 does not support SSLv2 the RSA_padding_check_SSLv23() function still exists, as does the RSA_SSLV23_PADDING padding mode. Applications that directly call that function or use that padding mode will encounter this issue. However since there is no support for the SSLv2 protocol in 1.1.1 this is considered a bug and not a security issue in that version. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is out of support and no longer receiving public updates. Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 should upgrade to 1.0.2y. Other users should upgrade to 1.1.1j. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2y (Affected 1.0.2s-1.0.2x).

    Published: 16 Feb 2021
    9.6
    Critical

    CVE-2021-20195

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    A flaw was found in keycloak in versions before 13.0.0. A Self Stored XSS attack vector escalating to a complete account takeover is possible due to user-supplied data fields not being properly encoded and Javascript code being used to process the data. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.

    Published: 16 Feb 2021
    7.5
    High

    CVE-2021-20222

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    A flaw was found in keycloak. The new account console in keycloak can allow malicious code to be executed using the referrer URL. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.

    Published: 16 Feb 2021
    8.1
    High

    CVE-2021-21511

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    Dell EMC Avamar Server, versions 19.3 and 19.4 contain an Improper Authorization vulnerability in the web UI. A remote low privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, to gain unauthorized read or modification access to other users' backup data.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-1974

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-1973

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-1972

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-1970

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-1969

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-1966

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-35621

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-35620

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-35619

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-35618

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-35617

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-3815

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-3816

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-3817

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-3818

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-3819

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-3820

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-3821

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-3822

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-3823

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-3824

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-3813

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-3814

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    9.8
    Critical

    CVE-2021-26822

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    Teachers Record Management System 1.0 is affected by a SQL injection vulnerability in 'searchteacher' POST parameter in search-teacher.php. This vulnerability can be exploited by a remote unauthenticated attacker to leak sensitive information and perform code execution attacks.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    7.2
    High

    CVE-2020-35734

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    Sruu.pl in Batflat 1.3.6 allows an authenticated user to perform code injection (and consequently Remote Code Execution) via the input fields of the Users tab. To exploit this, one must login to the administration panel and edit an arbitrary user's data (username, displayed name, etc.). NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    9.8
    Critical

    CVE-2021-26201

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    The Login Panel of CASAP Automated Enrollment System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection authentication bypass. An attacker can obtain access to the admin panel by injecting a SQL query in the username field of the login page.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    9.8
    Critical

    CVE-2021-26200

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    The user area for Library System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection where a user can bypass the authentication and login as the admin user.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    9.8
    Critical

    CVE-2021-3239

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    E-Learning System 1.0 suffers from an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on the hosting web server and gain a reverse shell.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    7.2
    High

    CVE-2020-29143

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    A SQL injection vulnerability in interface/reports/non_reported.php in OpenEMR before 5.0.2.5 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the form_code parameter.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    7.2
    High

    CVE-2020-29139

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    A SQL injection vulnerability in interface/main/finder/patient_select.php from library/patient.inc in OpenEMR before 5.0.2.5 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the searchFields parameter.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    7.2
    High

    CVE-2020-29140

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    A SQL injection vulnerability in interface/reports/immunization_report.php in OpenEMR before 5.0.2.5 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the form_code parameter.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    —
    Unknown

    CVE-2020-35500

    Last Modified: 7 Nov 2023

    DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    7.2
    High

    CVE-2020-29142

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    A SQL injection vulnerability in interface/usergroup/usergroup_admin.php in OpenEMR before 5.0.2.5 allows a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the schedule_facility parameter when restrict_user_facility=on is in global settings.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    7.2
    High

    CVE-2020-28337

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    A directory traversal issue in the Utils/Unzip module in Microweber through 1.1.20 allows an authenticated attacker to gain remote code execution via the backup restore feature. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker must have the credentials of an administrative user, upload a maliciously constructed ZIP file with file paths including relative paths (i.e., ../../), move this file into the backup directory, and execute a restore on this file.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    7.5
    High

    CVE-2021-27211

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    steghide 0.5.1 relies on a certain 32-bit seed value, which makes it easier for attackers to detect hidden data.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    8.8
    High

    CVE-2021-27201

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    Endian Firewall Community (aka EFW) 3.3.2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary OS commands via shell metacharacters in a backup comment.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    9.8
    Critical

    CVE-2021-3375

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    ActivePresenter 6.1.6 is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability that may result in a denial of service (DoS) or arbitrary code execution.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    8.8
    High

    CVE-2020-24899

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    Nagios XI 5.7.2 is affected by a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability. An authenticated user can inject additional commands into normal webapp query.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    7.2
    High

    CVE-2020-22427

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    NagiosXI 5.6.11 is affected by a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability. An authenticated nagiosadmin user can inject additional commands into a request. NOTE: the vendor disputes whether the CVE and its references are actionable because all technical details are omitted, and the only option is to pay for a subscription service where technical details may be disclosed at an unspecified later time

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    8.8
    High

    CVE-2020-22425

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    Centreon 19.10-3.el7 is affected by a SQL injection vulnerability, where an authorized user is able to inject additional SQL queries to perform remote command execution.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    7.1
    High

    CVE-2020-29031

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    An Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability exists in the web UI of the GateManager which allows an authenticated attacker to reset the password of any user in its domain or any sub-domain, via escalation of privileges. This issue affects all GateManager versions prior to 9.2c

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    6.6
    Medium

    CVE-2021-23338

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    This affects all versions of package qlib. The workflow function in cli part of qlib was using an unsafe YAML load function.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021
    9
    Critical

    CVE-2020-29026

    Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024

    A directory traversal vulnerability exists in the file upload function of the GateManager that allows an authenticated attacker with administrative permissions to read and write arbitrary files in the Linux file system. This issue affects: GateManager all versions prior to 9.2c.

    Published: 15 Feb 2021